FIGS_2 contains network figs for all components of reduced Google matrix
only for banks sector with depth 2

FIGS_2 contains network figs for all components of reduced Google matrix
only for banks sector with depth 10

FIGS255_2 contains network figs for all components of reduced Google matrix
for 60 banks and 195 countries with depth 2

FIGS255_10 contains network figs for all components of reduced Google matrix
for 60 banks and 195 countries with depth 10


In Fig.3 of the paper we limit ourselves to the full reduced Google matrix 
$G_R$, containing all contributions from direct and indirect links, 
and the maximal depth at level 2. However, here we also 
present further network figures (and network data files) for the other 
matrices for direct links 
$G_{rr}$, indirect links $G_{qr}$ and the sum of both $G_{rr}+G_{qr}$. 
We refer to these data to determine if for example certain small countries 
follow a big bank because of a direct or an indirect link. We also 
provide there for all cases network figures for maximal depth level 10. 
It turns out that in most cases there is a maximal level quite 
below 10 after which no more nodes are added for the next level 
since all potential followers 
(friends) are already present in the former levels. 

Also here, we also provide data for the pure bank networks 
(without countries) for all four matrix cases, the two maximal depth cases 
of 2 and 10, and the reduced Google matrix of size $60\times 60$ using only 
bank nodes (and no countries nodes). We mention that network figures 
obtained from these $60\times 60$ matrices are slightly different from those 
of the $255\times 255$ matrices even if in the latter the country nodes are 
omitted since the $60\times 60$ bank-bank subblocks of the big matrices 
(for banks and countries) are slightly different from 
$60\times 60$ $G_R$-matrices computed from the very beginning using 
bank nodes only. In particular, the 
latter include contributions from indirect links from banks to countries and 
back to banks. Those links correspond to the two off-diagonal subblocks of 
the $255\times 255$ matrices as direct links and do not contribute in the 
indirect links of the bank-bank subblock there. 
